Calf Strain Risk Factors in Runners: Causes, Load & Prevention
- Greg Dea

- Sep 4
- 4 min read
Calf strains in runners happen when the calf–Achilles unit is asked to do more than it currently tolerates. Here’s the clean, clinic-ready map of intrinsic, extrinsic, and training-load risk factors—then a zoom-out to “any-injury” signals from large military cohorts.
Inline citations point you to primary research; full bibliography is at the end.

Intrinsic (you-centred) risk factors
Age (especially masters runners). Age is a consistent predictor of calf muscle strain injuries (CMSI): reductions in plantarflexor strength and tendon stiffness mean more strain per step for the same task (systematic review) (Green & Pizzari 2017). [1]
Previous calf injury. The strongest single predictor of a future calf strain is a prior calf strain—particularly within the first 6–8 weeks after return (systematic review) (Green & Pizzari 2017). [1]
Strength/endurance shortfalls or asymmetries. Inadequate calf capacity (gastroc/soleus) and side-to-side differences elevate risk; epidemiology and expert reviews highlight conditioning and asymmetry as modifiable contributors (Green & Pizzari 2017). [1]
Limited ankle dorsiflexion / calf tightness. Restricted DF increases tensile demand under stretch and during push-off, a common setup for strains (Green & Pizzari 2017). [1]
Higher BMI. Heavier runners experience greater per-step load through the calf–Achilles complex; BMI shows a modest but real association with injury in pooled analyses (Green & Pizzari 2017). [1]
Extrinsic (environment, footwear, mechanics)
Footwear & heel-to-toe drop. Low-drop/minimal shoes increase calf–Achilles demand; rapid transitions elevate risk. Definitions and characteristics of “minimalist” shoes (low drop, stack, stiffness) clarify why load shifts to the plantarflexors when you go more minimal (Running Clinic Minimalist Index; plus Achilles/calf load increases with forefoot striking) (Esculier et al.; ISBS/Achilles loading analyses). [7][8]
Surface & terrain. Stiffer surfaces raise impact demands; softer/uneven surfaces increase stabilising work—both are fine if progressed gradually, but abrupt changes can spike risk (field/biomechanics studies). [9]
Running form (foot-strike). Forefoot striking shifts load distally, increasing Achilles/calf forces compared with rearfoot striking—useful if planned/conditioned, risky if abrupt (biomechanics reviews/analyses). [8]
Training-load (the big lever)
Spikes in volume or intensity. The clearest pattern across elite sport: unusually hard weeks (distance, high-speed running, accelerations/decelerations) precede non-contact strains. In soccer, calf strains have been specifically preceded by weeks with higher-than-habitual external workloads; ACWR spike papers show 5–7× higher injury rates with sharp spikes (Bowen et al.; calf-specific workload pilot). [5][6]
Faster-than-usual running & hills added abruptly. Sprinting (gastroc) and steep uphills (soleus) magnify calf demand; layer them in only after you’ve banked capacity (Green & Pizzari 2017). [1]
High frequency + thin recovery. Fatigue degrades coordination and absorption; strains cluster late in sessions/cycles when recovery lags (ACWR/season-long monitoring). [5]
“Any-injury” risk from military cohorts (how it informs runners)
Teyhen et al., US Army Rangers (prospective model). A multivariable bundle predicted injuries: smoking, prior surgery, recurrent prior injury/limited duty days, pain on FMS clearing tests, ankle dorsiflexion asymmetry, slower 2-mile run, fewer sit-ups. Risk climbed steeply as factors accumulated (CORR 2015).
Translation: pain with movement and asymmetry are high-yield flags; cardiorespiratory and trunk endurance capacity are protective. [2]
Plisky line (Y-Balance / FMS in military). Across military/active-duty samples, asymmetry and pain during movement outperform blunt composite cut-scores for risk identification; Y-Balance has reliability and predictive validity signals relevant to field screening (systematic review/meta-analysis; military reliability). [3][4]
Capacity still wins. Slower timed runs (lower aerobic fitness) consistently correlate with higher injury risk in service members; improving base fitness lowers global risk exposure (Teyhen model components). [2]
Make it actionable (quick prompts)
Q. What have I decided I can “push through”? (Pain on a clearing test? Obvious L/R DF asymmetry?) If yes, clear it before you add load (Teyhen 2015; Y-Balance work). [2][3]
Q. Is this mine? Are your load spikes coming from your plan—or from comparison/schedule pressure? Smooth the last 4–6 weeks; cap spikes; add a deload (Bowen 2020; calf-specific workload pilot). [5][6]
Q. Light or heavy? If you reduce load 10–20% for two weeks while fixing DF asymmetry and adding trunk endurance, does your system feel lighter? (Teyhen bundle signals; ACWR logic). [2][5]
Q. Creating more, or maintaining comfort? Are your shoes/surface/foot-strike serving capacity—or preserving a limitation? Transition footwear/terrain gradually if changing (Minimalist Index; Achilles-load papers; surface study). [7][8][9]
Bibliography
1) Green B, Pizzari T. Calf muscle strain injuries in sport: a systematic review of risk factors. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(16):1189–1194.
2) Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Lorenson CL, et al. What Risk Factors Are Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in US Army Rangers? A Prospective Prognostic Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:2948–2958.
3) Plisky PJ, Schwartkopf-Phifer K, et al. Systematic Review & Meta-analysis of the Y-Balance Test: reliability, discriminant validity, predictive validity. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021.
4) Bullock GS, et al. Military/active-duty movement screening and injury risk overviews (MP3/related). Inj Prev. 2018;24(1):81–88.
5) Bowen L, et al. Spikes in Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR) associated with higher injury rate in professional football. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(12):731–738.
6) Influence of the External Workload on Calf Muscle Strain Injuries in Professional Football Players (pilot).
7) Esculier J-F, et al. Minimalist Index—definition & characteristics of minimalist shoes. J Foot Ankle Res.
8) Acute effects of footwear & foot-strike on Achilles tendon loading (ISBS proceedings) and related biomechanics overviews.
9) Nigg BM, et al. Running surface and impact/acceleration differences across surfaces. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(14):6405.
.png)

Comments